iePolitics: Environmentalists and the Environment – Part Three

It is said that the love of money is the root of all evil and human behavior certainly suggests that the adoration of the almighty greenback brings about the demise of many a man.  When we come across a panhandler on the street, some of us will throw change his way while others will look in the opposite direction, assuming he is trying to get something for nothing.

The same goes for charities and non-profits.  Some of us take the good works these organizations tout at face value while others look at all who ask for money with skepticism.  And casting a critical and inquisitive eye towards non-profits is a wise decision.

As I delved into the controversy behind Nursery Products‘ attempt to open a composting site in Hinkley, California, I discovered that not all environmentalists’ consider the environment their priority.  As with so many movements, legitimate or not, that aforementioned almighty greenback plays a more significant role in determining what is righteous and what is not, or in this case, in what is “environmentally sound” and what is not.   Few decisions are based upon ethics, integrity, or belief in the cause.  And those associated with HelpHinkley.org seem to epitomize just that paradox.

We discussed HelpHinkley’s founder, Norm Diaz, in Part Two of this series.  As disconcerting as that situation may be, it pales in comparison to the “environmental justice litigation organization” paid to fight this composting site.  According to the Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment (CRPE) website:

The Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment is an environmental justice litigation organization dedicated to helping grassroots groups across the United States attack head on the disproportionate burden of pollution borne by poor people and people of color. We provide organizing, technical and legal assistance to help community groups stop immediate environmental threats.

And here is the biography of the attorney handling the court cases for HelpHinkley:


Ingrid Brostrom
Staff Attorney
San Francisco

Ingrid Brostrom, a graduate of the University of California-Hastings College of the Law, joins CRPE’s Delano office as an Equal Justice Works Fellow.  Her fellowship project, “Don’t Waste the Valley,” focuses on waste issues facing the Central Valley ranging from hazardous waste facility expansion to biosolid application on agricultural lands.  Before joining CRPE, Ingrid worked primarily on wildlife and land conservation issues.  She graduated from the University of California at Santa Cruz with degrees in environmental studies and politics and interned with the Jane Goodall Institute, the Center on Biological Diversity and the Sierra Club.  She was an articles editor for the West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policy and published a piece on protecting culturally significant wildlife using the National Historic Preservation Act.  Her focus shifted toward environmental justice after interning with the Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment during her final summer in law school.  When not working, Ingrid enjoys traveling and learning about foreign cultures.  She also considers herself a rugby player for life.

In reviewing the CRPE website and Brostrom’s biography, one could easily argue that CPRE is a noble organization fighting a noble cause.  One could . . . until one discovers why CPRE became involved in this battle.

Nursery Products has complied with every environmental regulation required of it.  The site has been designed to withstand a 1000-year flood and other precautions so that there is no possible way to contaminate the water supply.  It will not be on the electrical grid but will instead be self-sufficient with its own solar-powered system to supply its electrical needs.  And it will only use about the equivalent of two households’ worth of water.  It is located eight miles from the nearest community and two miles from the nearest dwelling.  It will provide a cost savings to local jurisdictions and reduce pollutants being emitted by diesels that otherwise must truck biosolids to Arizona or Kern County.  So why has HelpHinkley and CRPE sued to stop the project?

The problem, as we have said in previous articles, is McCarthy Farms, located in Bakersfield, California.  McCarthy Farms is Nursery Products’ nearest competitor and stands to lose a great deal of revenue received from Southern California cities and counties, which are currently forced to ship their biosolids to Kern County for lack of a local composting or disposal site locally that will accept them.

McCarthy Farms just happens to have donated $400,000 to the Center of Race, Poverty & the Environment.  So much for taking a stand for what is right!

Here is a photo of McCarthy Farms’ composting site in Bakersfield taken from their own website:

CRPE argues that the Hinkley site should be enclosed but their large benefactor’s site is not.  CRPE argues that the Hinkley site is too close to the community, yet their benefactor’s site is in Bakersfield, surrounded by a community.  As one can see from this photo, it located much closer than two miles from the nearest dwelling.  The Hinkley site has been built for a 1000-year flood.  The McCarthy site has been built for a 25-year flood.  And much more.

Since CRPE is about helping the poor and those of color, one should ask them how much of that $400,000 donation has gone to help the people of Hinkley.  To top it off, because the court ordered Nursery Products to provide a supplemental Environmental Impact Review to address issues raised by HelpHinkley and CRPE, Nursery Products will be required to pay attorney’s fees expected to total close to $400,000.  Again, is CRPE sharing any of their new-found wealth with the citizens of Hinkley? Or is it possible that the citizens of Hinkley are simply a pawn in an environmental law firm’s shakedown of the owners of a legitimate and environmentally sound venture  by manipulating the system that was otherwise meant to protect our citizens’ from corporate greed and injustice?

In the end, it is the taxpayers of Hinkley and all of San Bernardino County that are harmed by these phony do-gooders who use the state’s strict environmental laws to harm the environment further and line their own pockets through extortion, hysteria, and mistruth.

For those who missed the video the first time, here it is again:


13 thoughts on “iePolitics: Environmentalists and the Environment – Part Three

  1. These are the same wackos that want renewable, clean energy but sue to stop a wind or solar farm. They stop the building of a park to protect a fruit fly. It is all about money.

  2. She must have been in a scrum for too long. What a waste of effort and time for all. There are real pressing issues in communities such as Wilmington and Carson, CA where minorities are forced to live near sites generating/transporting and illegally storing hazardous waste. The regulatory community does not listen to the voices of the colored community…what a shame.

    Try to locate a hazardous waste transporter that is not located in a poor or minority community…good luck with that search.

  3. Where do I turn in my application? I want to drive that tractor in the photo. Does it have a 8 track player?

  4. These “environmentalists” are going to send California to the bankruptcy line.

  5. Nursery Products complied with regulations so well that they lost most of our challenges to the site. These articles are just ad hominem attacks. You can’t fight on the science or the regulations so you have to attack us personally.

    My name Steven Smith and I am proud member of HelpHinkley and I will be more that glad debate on the facts of sewage sludge but you will probably pull the easy way out and just attack me. Either way I welcome it

  6. Have you not noticed Steve that they lost two and those have been corrected. The plan is expected to be approved tomorrow.

    I find it interesting that you guys sure can dish out all the crap and false information but when challenged you run away with your tails between your legs. Poor, poor Norm went crying to Barb today. Her and her 20 listeners are going to do a lot for you. When she’s not bashing the Chinese, Mexicans and gays, maybe she’ll give you some more airtime to whine about how we are being mean to you by debunking all your conspiracy theories.

  7. I would argue with some more but I rather argue Meberg and Brad because all your “facts” come from them.

  8. Interesting comment on your BS allegations

    From: “Wilson Nolan”
    Date: July 12, 2010 1:56:57 PM PDT
    To: “‘D. Norman Diaz’”
    Subject: RE: False stories about McCarthy

    Hello Norman

    I have been following your efforts in the press over the past few years. The story in the links provided is certainly amusing and makes a convincing conspiracy story. However, you should be aware our prices are about the same as what we hear Nursery Products will be charging municipal customers for composting biosolids. Accordingly, the basis for the conspiracy story does not exist. No, we have not paid you nor have we funded Center for Race Poverty and the Environment to file the CEWA lawsuit.

    Regards,
    . . . Wilson

    Wilson E. Nolan
    Chief Executive Officer
    McCarthy Family Farms, Inc.
    1601 Skyway Drive
    Suite 205
    Bakersfield, CA 93308
    Cell Phone (661) 619-7320
    FAX (775) 367-2731
    http://www.mccarthyfarms.com

  9. As I said on your other posting 1. I never said that McCarthy Farms funded the lawsuit and 2. McCarthy has not denied giving CPRE $400,000.

  10. Money is fungible and McCarthy Farms knows it. They donated $400k to CPRE in an effort to get them to shut down one of McCarthy Farms potential competitors. That is crystal clear.

    If CPRE is truly frightened of the impacts of an open-air composting facility, here’s a question. Why don’t they file a lawsuit to shut down McCarthy Farms? That’s an open-air site.

    No, its clear that municipalities (and taxpayers) will save by composting at a site that is closer than McCarthy Farms, even if the rates are identical.

    I think it is laughable that Steve Smith thinks that it is purely coincidental that McCarthy Farms handed a $400,000 check to CPRE, then CPRE goes on a jihad against one of McCarthy Farms’ competitors.

  11. If you really want to understand what is going on with the current environmental protests against the local wind and solar projects, you really need to read the C.U.R.E. website and look at their socialist labor politics. Greenmail can be loosely defined as a type of legal blackmail. In hostile takeovers, one person or group of persons decide to take over a controlling of a public company without that company’s consent and, in the early stages, without its knowledge. In this case, we have union laborors supporting projects they have signed labor agreements with – and lawyers and bilogists fighting projects that will not conced control of their jobs to union representation PRE project approval. Just attend any California Energy Commission hearing and you can watch all the out of town union hired guns they fly in to stop projects that wont sign a labor agreement.

    It is ALL about controlling the jobs people, because that is where the real “power” is in creating a monopoly in the renewable green industry. (http://www.sbctc.org/cure/default.asp?id=2395&pagetype=subpage)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>